Infuriating to re-read this by @MattSeyler from a year ago. Flawed analysis by DoD… "It's our assessment that they don't currently require ATACMS to service targets that are directly relevant to the current fight" Lives and opportunities lost.
Infuriating to re-read this by @MattSeyler from a year ago. Flawed analysis by DoD… "It's our assessment that they don't currently require ATACMS to service targets that are directly relevant to the current fight" Lives and opportunities lost.
Leave a Reply