My take on this is that the U.S. and Ukraine can employ a hybrid approach to striking Russian territory with the IS weapons 8/

→ View original post on X — @mylovanov

First, Ukraine can strike anything within 5 miles of the Ukrainian border, and if needed claim errors. Then, see what the Russia reaction is and gradually increase the distance. This is exactly what Russia does – tries small and expands. It is time Ukraine and the U.S. copy 9/

→ View original post on X — @mylovanov

Blinken dodged the question, of sorts: With regard to Ukraine, adapt and adjust means exactly that.  I think what you’ve seen that as the nature of the battlefield has changed – we’ve adapted and adjusted to that 6/

→ View original post on X — @mylovanov

Blinken comment came after he gave a pretty detailed picture of how the situation has been changing in favor of Ukraine and will continue to do so. He did acknowledge the Russia campaign in Kharkiv and that it has been enabled by the delay in the U.S. aid 2/

→ View original post on X — @mylovanov

The reporter, however, pressed more: Mr.  Secretary, when you say the U.S. will adapt and adjust to conditions on the battlefield in Ukraine, are you signaling a greater openness by the United States to allow Ukrainians to strike legitimate military Russian targets in Russia? 3/

→ View original post on X — @mylovanov

Germany is cautiously allowing Ukraine to use German-supplied weapons to hit military targets inside Russia, signaling a shift from previous reservations.

→ View original post on X — @euromaidanpress

The US state of Texas is completing the construction of a plant that will soon produce 30,000 artillery shells per month, almost doubling the current production in the US. The ammunition will be supplied to Ukraine, the New York Times reports.

→ View original post on X — @hromadske