Most of these forcibly recruited people are dead by now. What will Russia do with this force? Moldova? Baltics? Georgia? Kazakhstan? There is no reason why Russia will stop in Ukraine. Just a belief or hope that it would be insane for Russia to attack other countries. 18/

→ View original post on X — @mylovanov

The letter calls for "immediate ceasefire and negotiations without any disqualifying or prohibitive preconditions". The implication here is that Ukraine should abandon its citizens in the occupied territories who are being terrorized by Russia. 13/

→ View original post on X — @mylovanov

Well, Russia is destroying the spirit of resistance in Ukraine in the areas it occupies. But Ukraine won't have any of it. It is an existential fight for Ukraine. But it is not for Russia, and it is not about NATO. Russia can loose and go on ok. 12/

→ View original post on X — @mylovanov

No, it has never been about NATO, but about the fact the Ukrainians dared to tell Russia to go mind itself and turned to Europe. But NATO fears cannot justify systemic rape, torture, and other war crimes in the occupied territories. How is that related? 11/

→ View original post on X — @mylovanov

No, it will not be humiliation as the evidence show. Russia withdrew from Kyiv, Kharkiv, Kherson, and not a thing changed. But it had to be forced to do it. And this how the war will go. Ukraine will force Russia give up territory until it is out of Ukraine. 9/

→ View original post on X — @mylovanov

The Budapest memorandum, the Kharkiv agreements, the demarcation of the border of Ukraine, the case of Tuzla island, or the ceasefire agreements from 2014 to 2021. The problem is that the only mechanism to enforce any agreement with Russia is to have sufficient force. 7/

→ View original post on X — @mylovanov

This literally means weapons. Ukraine should be able to militarily defend itself, only then any agreement will carry any weight. Claim 3. The US is leaving Russian no choice but to either be humiliated or use nukes. But Russia can withdraw its forces and end the war. 8/

→ View original post on X — @mylovanov

Claim 1. More weapons is a guarantee of further death and destruction. This claim only makes sense if you don't think about it. But if you do, you see that the Western weapons allowed Ukraine to liberate Bucha, Kharkiv, Kherson, stopping torture, rape and executions there. 2/

→ View original post on X — @mylovanov

Yesterday and the night before, the Western provided air defense protected people and saved lives. Before Patriots, people would die from Russian missile strikes. The Western weapons help liberate territories and protect Ukrainian controlled territories. 3/

→ View original post on X — @mylovanov

Zhytomyr oblast — you also have Shaheds now.

→ View original post on X — @euromaidanpr