#Нацгвардійці відповіли на питання, які 9-річні діти не розуміли про військових: https://
youtu.be/i5cLfa33WT0
Full-scale invasion and national resilience, broadcasted live.
-

National Guard answers children’s questions about military service.
-

Tribute to Ukraine’s Security Service for their contribution to victory
Вітаємо працівників @ServiceSsu та дякуємо, колеги! Ви робите надважливий вклад у нашу спільну Перемогу України, лишаючись непомітними героями!
Цей болючий рік став апогеєм вашої ефективності. Ви навіюєте страх на ворога і жах на зрадників і злочинців! Слава Україні й її Героям! -

Life and normalcy in wartime Kyiv
Life goes on in Kyiv – just met a party bus on my way to work. I have mixed feelings. Are parties ok during wartime? Probably not. But then again to sustain life, we should live a normal life. If if people want to party, it is good that they can do it.
-

262 Ukrainian athletes killed by Russians; boycott Russian sport
262 #Ukrainian athletes and coaches were killed by Russians during the aggression against #Ukraine . Another 16 were wounded, 28 are in captivity, and 6 are still missing. Many Ukrainian athletes will never go to the @olympics
, and what about #Russians? #BoycottRussianSport -
Honoring sacrifices and ensuring their legacy lives on.
and we are left with a responsibility to make sure their sacrifices are never in vain.
-
Supporting Ukraine with whatever it takes to win
It is a “one step at a time” approach. It works well in most circumstances but not now. The world has changed drastically. Addressing the new threats thus requires drastic changes. And so giving Ukraine whatever it takes to win the war is the better way forward. END
-
Supporting Ukraine despite Russian nuclear rhetoric
Therefore, we have to take risks and support Ukraine despite the threatening rhetoric of Russia. Russia indeed might use nukes if it is threatened. But in no way Russia is threatened in Ukraine. There are no existential or other major consequences for Russia if it leaves Ukraine9
-
Russian Nuclear Threats and Ukraine Invasion Justification
There is always a question “but what is they use nukes?” Yes, this is a valid question, but it requires an honest answer. Does the fact that Russia has nukes and threatens to use them, unless it gets its way in Ukraine, imply that Russia should be allowed to invade and kill? 7/
-
Ukraine’s Military Equipment Drove Russian Withdrawal
The same is true about Kherson and Kharkiv. Russia withdrew because Ukraine had HIMARS and 777s and drones and whatnot, not because Ukraine did not have them. 5/
-
Western weapons enabled Ukraine’s Kyiv victory
It lost the Battle of Kyiv and left the Kyiv region because Ukraine was given weapons, laws, stingers, and javelins, not because Ukraine was at the time dined artillery. In fact, if Ukraine had artillery and HIMARS at the time, Russia would withdraw from Kyiv sooner 4/
