🇺🇦⚔️ Українська історія боротьби за незалежність налічує не одне століття і це не просто слова. Сотні років затятої боротьби та самопожертви наших предків подарували нам історичну можливість, якою ми і скористалися 33 роки тому.

І хай би як складно не було сьогодні, але свою… pic.twitter.com/ZRTR4Bg4J8

— НГУ (@ng_ukraine) 24 août 2024

Українська історія боротьби за незалежність налічує не одне століття і це не просто слова. Сотні років затятої боротьби та самопожертви наших предків подарували нам історичну можливість, якою ми і скористалися 33 роки тому. І хай би як складно не було сьогодні, але свою

→ View original post on X — @ng_ukraine

🇩🇪 @Bundeskanzler, 🇮🇪 @SimonHarrisTD, 🇲🇩 @sandumaiamd and 🇳🇴 @jonasgahrstore congratulated #Ukraine on the Independence Day!

Thank you! 🇺🇦 pic.twitter.com/FSZgMRj8cw

— MFA of Ukraine 🇺🇦 (@MFA_Ukraine) 24 août 2024

@Bundeskanzler
, @SimonHarrisTD
, @sandumaiamd and @jonasgahrstore congratulated #Ukraine on the Independence Day! Thank you!

→ View original post on X — @mfa_ukraine

I don't know the real reason behind the Biden administration's reluctance to take decisive action to help Ukraine win the war or at least stop Russia, but it's none of the above. There's a clear pattern of fear and delays, which is eventually overcome time and again 11/

→ View original post on X — @mylovanov

Then, there is a a belief in current sufficiency: The Biden administration maintains that Ukraine already has the necessary authorities and capabilities to win the war under current restrictions. This of course is total BS and they know it. 10/

→ View original post on X — @mylovanov

Some US officials argued that the weapons wouldn’t be effective, citing Ukraine's supposed lack of logistics, trained personnel, and the ability to reach or penetrate targets in Russia. Well, let Ukraine be the judge of that 9/

→ View original post on X — @mylovanov

Instead, Russia reacts to events on the ground and developments at the front lines. If they can take Bakhmut, they push forward no matter what. If they can't defend Kursk, they simply declare it the "new normal." 8/

→ View original post on X — @mylovanov

Politico reports the US is concerned that deep strikes could hinder post-war normalization with Russia. Yet, long range precision weapons, limited strikes on Russian territory, intelligence sharing, and sanctions didn’t. Extending Ukraine’s strike range will? I don’t buy it 4/

→ View original post on X — @mylovanov

There are several publicly known arguments for why the US wouldn't allow deep strikes or, in the past, opposed providing weapons and permitting their effective use None of them hold up 5/

→ View original post on X — @mylovanov

Yet, despite no escalation after Kursk or after providing F-16s, ATACMS, HIMARS, or Abrams tanks—the US still hasn't reconsidered its policy against deep strikes on Russia. Instead, they've just come up with a new excuse 3/

→ View original post on X — @mylovanov

Zelensky: The whole naive, illusory concept of so-called red lines regarding Russia, which dominated the assessment of the war by some partners [the US], has crumbled these days somewhere near Sudzha [Kursk] 2/

→ View original post on X — @mylovanov