Russian rear security refusal: admitting invasion, not liberation?

Does the Russian refusal to do seemingly *anything* to provide rear security for their forces come down to the fact that this would be tacitly admitting they aren't 'liberators', but actually an invading, occupying army? Are they still clinging to that myth?

→ View original post on X — @jimmysecuk,

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *