Oh, I see what you mean. That's an interesting nuance. I translated it as systems because I thought that's what they meant – I hadn't considered that they're literally claiming that Westerners are firing them. I guess it goes with their depiction of Ukrainians as yokels.

→ View original post on X — @chriso_wiki

‼️ "Вас втягивают в войну", – Зеленський звернувся до білорусівhttps://t.co/MtSqeSZciu pic.twitter.com/DI6Dj4ofqL

— Цензор.НЕТ ✍️ (@censor_net) 26 juin 2022

“You are being dragged into a war,” Zelensky addressed Belarusians

→ View original post on X — @censor_net

27/ The first would suggest the will to continue the conflict until all war aims are achieved. However, this is only possible depending on the residual RU potential, which is unknown to us.

→ View original post on X — @egea_blog

23/ They can also restart the action and take advantage of the disorganization of the UKR formation to attempt breakthroughs. This option would be the most logical if the UK had shown maneuver capabilities over the past three months.

→ View original post on X — @egea_blog

22/ The Russians have several opportunities: they will have to control the conquered areas, but the example of Marioupol suggests that this should not consume too much effort. They can take the opportunity to organize reliefs of their tired troops.

→ View original post on X — @egea_blog

21/ An English analyst saw a positive aspect in the affair: the reduction of the front by 50 km, which would constitute an advantage for Ukraine: let us simply observe that this reduction of the front also operates to the benefit of Russia, which will be able to concentrate its blows even further.

→ View original post on X — @egea_blog

19/ Indeed, they must re-establish themselves on a line to the west. The first possibility connects Bakhmouth to Siversk. But it follows a thalweg and is already directly threatened by RU pressure. The second is placed a little further back, on the hillside.

→ View original post on X — @egea_blog

18/ But a ratio of 1 to 3 or 5 is evidently enough to prevail. It may not be brilliant or media-friendly but it is effective: the Russians have conquered several hundred km² this week. However, the Ukrainian setup is permanently weakened in the northern Donbas.

→ View original post on X — @egea_blog

17/ (we are thinking here of the urban combat in Mariupol or SK) or in the field do not hold, especially if the asymmetry of the artilleries is notable. Let's recall the figure cited last week from a report of 1 to 10, probably exaggerated.

→ View original post on X — @egea_blog

16/ The RU are indeed managing slow progress, in a likely 1.5 to 1 force ratio, thanks to their artillery and aviation. This compensates for their weaker infantry, which is on par with UKR infantry. UKR defenses, whether in urban areas

→ View original post on X — @egea_blog